So just why then dismiss bisexuality to be about “only people” as soon as the definitions of hetero and homo do not mention those? And just why never the experts of this expressed term also have a chance at people utilizing “heterosexual” or “homosexual” on the grounds of the terms being much more limited?
Some people choose to re state those as in this modern age with a wider understanding of gender
In reality many individuals state there is a lot more than two genders, but then we think it’s clear that “both” can refer to those two options rather than two perceived sexes if two options are either “similar to me” or “different to me. So just why maybe not have that as our “please follow this meaning” meaning? Well, if there is significantly more than two genders plus some individuals are no sex, or numerous then it really is possible to be interested in one or more gender that’s not such as your very own, rather than fancy your own personal after all. Attraction to one or more gender does not mean there’s one which you need to fancy if not. Therefore we like the inclusion and simplicity of ‘more than one’.
This basically means: bisexuality is not an effort to pigeonhole sex, oahu is the freedom to feel attraction without blinkers! But we agree that ‘both’ is a word that is oddly limiting the group of “everyone else” this is the reason we state “more than one sex” in the Bisexual Index. Lees verder So just why perhaps not have that as our “please adopt this meaning” meaning?